By LESLEY ALDERMAN
The New York Times
August 29, 2009
IF you watch enough television, you’d think that treating erectile dysfunction was as effortless as popping a pill and then whirling your partner around the living room in a romantic dance. Correcting erectile dysfunction, alas, is not so simple — and it can be rather costly. One Viagra pill, for example, the most common way to treat erection problems, costs about $15.
Insurers can be chary of reimbursements. And despite the fact that E.D., as the dysfunction is known, becomes increasingly common after men reach 65, Medicare Part D does not cover drugs for it.
An estimated 30 million men in this country experience erectile dysfunction. Nearly a third of men in their 50s experience E.D., whereas more than half of those in their 60s have the problem.
If you’re hoping to have Viagra-aided sex twice a week, your bill for the entire year could run around $1,500. If you’re fortunate enough to have insurance that covers the medications, your co-pay will be on the high side, around $40 for a one-month supply of six to eight pills — bringing your annual bill to a more manageable $500 or so. There are no generic versions of E.D. meds yet.
Even among the name-brand drugs, which also include Cialis and Levitra, the medications do not work for about half of the men with E.D., says Dr. Ajay Nehra, professor of urology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. He is also president of the Sexual Medicine Society, an association of health care professionals.
And yet, as it turns out there are other treatments for E.D. And some of them are more cost-effective than the brand-name pills advertised on television.
“There is not a man out there that cannot be helped in some way with his E.D. — even if money is an issue,” says Dr. Andrew McCullough, an associate professor of urology and director of Male Sexual Health and Fertility at the Langone Medical Center at New York University.
The first step is to see a doctor who specializes in E.D. (usually a urologist) and have your overall health checked out. If your primary care physician can’t make a recommendation, contact the Sexual Medicine Society and ask for a referral.
In many of cases, E.D. is the sign of an underlying disorder like diabetes or hypertension. In fact, in younger men, erection problems are often the first symptom of cardiovascular disease.
“Erectile problems may show up about three years before a cardiovascular event such as a heart attack or stroke,” says Dr. Ira Sharlip, clinical professor of urology at the University of California, San Francisco.
That’s because plaque will start to clog the small arteries in the penis before the wider coronary arteries. Your doctor will also try to determine whether your E.D. is the result of a psychological issue, in which case he will refer you to a therapist. Depending on your policy, your insurer may cover a set number of visits. (One way for you to check on your own whether your issue may be psychological or physical is try the postage stamp test, also known as nocturnal penile tumescence test.)
By adopting healthier habits, you may be able to improve your overall well-being and restore your erectile function.
“There is increasing evidence that we can reverse erectile dysfunction with lifestyle changes,” says Dr. Drogo K. Montague, director of the Center for Genitourinary Reconstruction in the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute at Cleveland Clinic.
In a recent study of men with E.D., or at risk for developing it, researchers in Italy found that the men could improve their erections by losing weight, improving their diet and exercising more frequently. After two years of significant lifestyle changes, 58 percent of the men had normal erectile function, according to the study, which was published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine in January.
But lifestyle changes, while basically free, can be difficult to make and may take months to take effect. In the meantime, your doctor will probably prescribe a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, also called a PDE-5 inhibitor, like Viagra, Cialis or Levitra. These drugs enhance the effects of nitric oxide, a chemical that helps to increase blood flow in the penis. The three drugs work in the same way, but differ in how quickly they take effect and how long they last. If the PDE-5 drugs don’t work for you, don’t give up quickly, says Dr. McCullough, who theorizes that “in over 40 percent of drug failures the problem is with the user, not the drug.” Dr. McCullough adds, “it’s important to take these medications as directed, like on a totally empty stomach, rather than a full one, and not less than 60 minutes before sex.”
If the pills don’t work for you, you might want to try self-administered injections of alprostadil, a drug that helps blood vessels expand and facilitates erections. Granted, this may sound onerous, but the shot, which is sold under the brand names Edex and Caverject, is done with a fine needle, feels no worse than a pinprick and produces an erection that can last up to four hours, according to doctors who recommend it.
The shots cost about $35 per injection and are covered by most insurers, but not by Medicare.
But ask your doctor about an injection that’s a cocktail of generic forms of alprostadil, papaverine and phentolamine.
Although this generic combination is not F.D.A.-approved as an E.D. treatment, doctors are legally free to administer it — and both Dr. Sharlip and Dr. McCullough recommend it.
“The generic injections clearly work the best,” Dr. Sharlip said, “and are usually less expensive.”
Another cost-effective option is a vacuum erection device or penis pump. It works like this: you place a tube on the penis and then pump the air out of the tube, which pulls blood into the penis. When the penis is erect, you then put a snug ring around the base to maintain the erection, which lasts long enough to have sex.
The cost for the device, which requires a prescription, can run from $300 to $600, but most insurers and Medicare will cover part of the cost and the device should last for years. Even if you spend $300 out of pocket and use the device once a week, you’ll be spending much less per year than on pills or injections. You can also buy a nonprescription pump online (even Amazon carries some) for as little as $30, Dr. McCullough said.
Finally, if all other treatments fail, you could consider getting penile implants, an effective and permanent solution for chronic E.D. The most common type of implant works through inflation: two cylinders are placed inside the penis and a fluid-filled reservoir is implanted under the abdominal wall or groin muscles; a pump and a deflation valve are placed inside the scrotum. To create an erection, you pump fluid from the reservoir into the cylinders. To deflate the penis, you press the release valve.
Most insurers and Medicare cover the surgery, so your out-of-pocket costs will be minimal. This might be the most cost-effective strategy of all since, according to Dr. Nehra, 80 percent of implants last 10 years.
Original link: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/29/health/29patient.html?_r=2&hpw=&pagewanted=print
Saturday, September 5, 2009
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Seniors' Dating in the New Millennium
For Immediate Release
August 18, 2009
Seniors' Dating in the New Millennium
(Scarborough, ON): Due to overwhelming success, St. Paul’s L’Amoreaux Centre will host another Companion Connections, a social networking event designed for adults 55 years and older on Saturday, September 12, 2009 from 2:00-5:00 pm. A city-wide event, Companion Connections is a unique social event that allows older adults and seniors to meet new people, expand their social network, and make social connections.
As people get older, it becomes more challenging for them to expand their social networks and meet new people. This is especially true for individuals who are widowed, divorced, or isolated. Companion Connections is a fun, relaxed, and safe environment in which participants can meet up to 20 other single seniors in one day.
Companion Connections is modeled on a typical speed dating framework in which participants are given time to get to know each other in a relaxed conversation. Icebreaker questions are available for those who are nervous or shy. Men rotate seats every 6 minutes while women remain seated. If an individual is interested in their conversation partner, he or she will check off the person’s name on their score sheet. Contact information will only be given if both parties have checked off each other’s name. Our April event was successful with 21 matches being made.
St. Paul’s L’Amoreaux Centre’s Executive Director, Larry Burke, acknowledges the need for such programs in facilitating friendships for this audience. “The success of our first Companion Connections program demonstrates the need for these socialization opportunities for older adults and seniors.”
Companion Connections is a collaboration among several community agencies and seniors’ centres across the GTA. Partners include West Hill Community Services, Harmony Hall, North York Seniors Centre, Premier Home Care Services, Scarborough Support Services, and Revera Living. Participants are eligible to win several door prizes and will receive goody bags to take home. Steeles Deli Restaurant in Thornhill, Ontario, a long time supporter of St. Paul’s, will once again provide refreshments for participants.
Registration will be on a first come, first served basis. St. Paul’s will not be reserving spaces. The last day to register for this event is Friday, August 28, 2009.
For more information, please call 416-493-3333 ext 271 visit our website at www.splc.ca
About St. Paul’s L’Amoreaux Centre
St. Paul’s L’Amoreaux Centre provides community services and housing to older adults and seniors. Our vision is to provide a services and housing environment for seniors that allows them to live independently in their community with wellness and dignity and to provide this environment regardless of language, culture or ability to pay.
-30-
August 18, 2009
Seniors' Dating in the New Millennium
(Scarborough, ON): Due to overwhelming success, St. Paul’s L’Amoreaux Centre will host another Companion Connections, a social networking event designed for adults 55 years and older on Saturday, September 12, 2009 from 2:00-5:00 pm. A city-wide event, Companion Connections is a unique social event that allows older adults and seniors to meet new people, expand their social network, and make social connections.
As people get older, it becomes more challenging for them to expand their social networks and meet new people. This is especially true for individuals who are widowed, divorced, or isolated. Companion Connections is a fun, relaxed, and safe environment in which participants can meet up to 20 other single seniors in one day.
Companion Connections is modeled on a typical speed dating framework in which participants are given time to get to know each other in a relaxed conversation. Icebreaker questions are available for those who are nervous or shy. Men rotate seats every 6 minutes while women remain seated. If an individual is interested in their conversation partner, he or she will check off the person’s name on their score sheet. Contact information will only be given if both parties have checked off each other’s name. Our April event was successful with 21 matches being made.
St. Paul’s L’Amoreaux Centre’s Executive Director, Larry Burke, acknowledges the need for such programs in facilitating friendships for this audience. “The success of our first Companion Connections program demonstrates the need for these socialization opportunities for older adults and seniors.”
Companion Connections is a collaboration among several community agencies and seniors’ centres across the GTA. Partners include West Hill Community Services, Harmony Hall, North York Seniors Centre, Premier Home Care Services, Scarborough Support Services, and Revera Living. Participants are eligible to win several door prizes and will receive goody bags to take home. Steeles Deli Restaurant in Thornhill, Ontario, a long time supporter of St. Paul’s, will once again provide refreshments for participants.
Registration will be on a first come, first served basis. St. Paul’s will not be reserving spaces. The last day to register for this event is Friday, August 28, 2009.
For more information, please call 416-493-3333 ext 271 visit our website at www.splc.ca
About St. Paul’s L’Amoreaux Centre
St. Paul’s L’Amoreaux Centre provides community services and housing to older adults and seniors. Our vision is to provide a services and housing environment for seniors that allows them to live independently in their community with wellness and dignity and to provide this environment regardless of language, culture or ability to pay.
-30-
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Octegenarians heat up the dancefloor
Here are two links to women who are dancing into their 80s. These women are truly inspirational to people of all ages. And there's the role model piece, "if she can do it, so can I."
The first link is to a woman named Sarah Jones, also known as Paddy Jones. Although some youtube posts claim she's 87, she's a 75 year old salsa dancer who's been dazzling viewers all over the world with her sexy, classical moves on the dancefloor. Watch Sarah and her salsa partner, Nico, heat up the floor:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkHvRCp3z5A&feature=related
Dorothy Dale Kloss is an amazing woman. She's gorgeous, she's in great shape and she still dances at the Fabulous Palm Springs Follies. At 85 years old, she's the world's oldest showgirl. Physical activity, healthy eating, taking care of one's whole health is the key to not only long life, but living well longer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkHvRCp3z5A&feature=related
To watch the video on Dorothy, click here:
http://bulletin.aarp.org/yourworld/articles/Dorothy_Dale_Kloss_Oldest_Showgirl_in_the_World.html
To learn more about the Fabulous Palm Springs Follies, click here:
http://bulletin.aarp.org/yourworld/reinventing/articles/fabulous_palm_springs_follies_is_still_kicking.html
The first link is to a woman named Sarah Jones, also known as Paddy Jones. Although some youtube posts claim she's 87, she's a 75 year old salsa dancer who's been dazzling viewers all over the world with her sexy, classical moves on the dancefloor. Watch Sarah and her salsa partner, Nico, heat up the floor:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkHvRCp3z5A&feature=related
Dorothy Dale Kloss is an amazing woman. She's gorgeous, she's in great shape and she still dances at the Fabulous Palm Springs Follies. At 85 years old, she's the world's oldest showgirl. Physical activity, healthy eating, taking care of one's whole health is the key to not only long life, but living well longer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkHvRCp3z5A&feature=related
To watch the video on Dorothy, click here:
http://bulletin.aarp.org/yourworld/articles/Dorothy_Dale_Kloss_Oldest_Showgirl_in_the_World.html
To learn more about the Fabulous Palm Springs Follies, click here:
http://bulletin.aarp.org/yourworld/reinventing/articles/fabulous_palm_springs_follies_is_still_kicking.html
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Like a fine wine, sex life improves with age
This survey on sexual lifestyles in 50+ population was sponsored by Eli Lilly. The perspective focuses on erectile dysfunction. It discusses how older adults and seniors are sexually satisfied, how many engage in risky behaviours and sexually adventurous activities. No where in the study is sexually transmitted infections mentioned which is a shocking omission.
With 41% of respondents stating they are sexually adventurous, it is unbelievable and unconscionable to leave out the importance of safer sex practices. But then Eli Lilly, makers of Cialis, would not be concerned about consequences of unprotected sexual activity.
I stated in the CBC's Sex and Seniors documentary, that pharamaceutical companies must do more to educate their older adult and senior patients on safer sex practices. The Cialis website has a link to a 5 page info sheet on "Patient Information." Page two indicates, "CIALIS does not protect a man or his partner from sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV. Speak to your healthcare provider about ways to guard against sexually transmitted diseases."
If Eli Lilly wanted to do more inthe way of corporate social responsibility, they should consider an ad campaign advocating the joys of senior sexuality AND safer sex practices in this population.
MCauch
SageHealth Network
August 8, 2009
-------------------
The Globe and Mail
Report on Business
July 23, 2009
But sex and aging can raise new concerns for couples
TORONTO, July 23 /CNW/ - Many Canadians 50+ are finding that changes to their lifestyle are having a positive impact on their sex life, confessing they are more sexually adventurous, frisky or ferocious in bed. The 50+ crowd admits that the newfound freedom in their lives - as their nests become empty, they enter retirement, and some focus on new relationships - has had a positive impact on their sex life. Yet, despite these positive changes, many are concerned about how aging may lead to sexual issues like erectile dysfunction and the impact it may have on their sex life.
A national survey of Canadians 50+ reveals the sexual attitudes of this aging population. The survey showed that Canadians 50+ are gaining a new lease on life and returning to the spontaneity and intimacy enjoyed earlier in their relationships. In fact, key survey findings showed that among Canadians 50+:
<<
- 41 per cent stated they were sexually adventurous;(1)
- 40 per cent said they were frisky;(1)
- 16 per cent consider themselves ferocious in bed;(1)
- Close to half (45%) stated that their sexual inhibitions have
decreased since they turned 50;(1)
- More than one quarter (27%) stated the quality of their sex life has
improved since they turned 50;(1) and
- Close to half (49%) say that they are satisfied sexually.(1)
>>
"With retirement fast approaching and with sex having fewer taboos than for previous generations, what's not to celebrate about being over 50?" says Dr. David McKenzie, Couples and Sex Therapist in Vancouver. "Reducing stress and having a long-term connection with your partner can greatly contribute towards a more emotionally satisfying relationship as well as a more rewarding sex life."
Spontaneity: Keeping things interesting in the bedroom
Spontaneity is important to the sex life of Canadians 50+, according to almost three quarters of respondents, and over half wish that their sex life was more spontaneous.(1) However, there are concerns as the 50+ think about how sexual difficulties, such as erectile dysfunction (ED), will impact the spontaneity of their sex life as they age. Specifically, one quarter admitted that they or their partner has experienced erectile dysfunction and that it has a negative impact on their sex life.(1) Sexual issues such as experiencing erection difficulties can impact spontaneity in relationships as partners can become frustrated, embarrassed or anxious which, in turn, inhibits the ability for the man to maintain his erection.(2)
"If men and their partners are concerned about achieving and maintaining an erection, they should know that it is a very common medical condition that affects more than a third of Canadian men," says Dr. Gerald Brock, Professor of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Western Ontario. "Furthermore, experiencing difficulty with erections doesn't have to mean the end of spontaneous intimacy, and many treatment options are available that can give couples the freedom they desire and help to ensure an active and healthy sex life as they age, with great success. The really important message, for the literally tens of thousands of Canadian couples affected with sexual dysfunction, is to speak to their healthcare professional for information and understand their treatment options."
The national online survey was conducted by Leger Marketing using Leger Marketing's Web panel between April 14th and April 20th, 2009. It was sponsored by Eli Lilly Canada Inc. The survey interviewed a total of 1,510 respondents who were Canadian adults, 18 years of age and older. Of those 1,510 respondents, 494 were over the age of 50. Using a national random sample of 1,510 respondents from Leger Marketing's Web panel, this method simulates a probability sample that would yield a maximum margin of error of +/-2.5%, 19 times out of 20. The margin of error among the 494 respondents over the age of 50 is +/-4.4%, 19 times out of 20.
About Lilly
Lilly, a leading innovation-driven corporation, is developing a growing portfolio of first-in-class and best-in-class pharmaceutical products by applying the latest research from its own worldwide laboratories and from collaborations with eminent scientific organizations. Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, Lilly provides answers - through medicines and information - for some of the world's most urgent medical needs. Eli Lilly Canada, headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, employs close to 700 people across the country. Additional information about Eli Lilly Canada can be found at www.lilly.ca.
To see original link: http://www.globeinvestor.com/servlet/story/CNW.20090723.C8037/GIStory
With 41% of respondents stating they are sexually adventurous, it is unbelievable and unconscionable to leave out the importance of safer sex practices. But then Eli Lilly, makers of Cialis, would not be concerned about consequences of unprotected sexual activity.
I stated in the CBC's Sex and Seniors documentary, that pharamaceutical companies must do more to educate their older adult and senior patients on safer sex practices. The Cialis website has a link to a 5 page info sheet on "Patient Information." Page two indicates, "CIALIS does not protect a man or his partner from sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV. Speak to your healthcare provider about ways to guard against sexually transmitted diseases."
If Eli Lilly wanted to do more inthe way of corporate social responsibility, they should consider an ad campaign advocating the joys of senior sexuality AND safer sex practices in this population.
MCauch
SageHealth Network
August 8, 2009
-------------------
The Globe and Mail
Report on Business
July 23, 2009
But sex and aging can raise new concerns for couples
TORONTO, July 23 /CNW/ - Many Canadians 50+ are finding that changes to their lifestyle are having a positive impact on their sex life, confessing they are more sexually adventurous, frisky or ferocious in bed. The 50+ crowd admits that the newfound freedom in their lives - as their nests become empty, they enter retirement, and some focus on new relationships - has had a positive impact on their sex life. Yet, despite these positive changes, many are concerned about how aging may lead to sexual issues like erectile dysfunction and the impact it may have on their sex life.
A national survey of Canadians 50+ reveals the sexual attitudes of this aging population. The survey showed that Canadians 50+ are gaining a new lease on life and returning to the spontaneity and intimacy enjoyed earlier in their relationships. In fact, key survey findings showed that among Canadians 50+:
<<
- 41 per cent stated they were sexually adventurous;(1)
- 40 per cent said they were frisky;(1)
- 16 per cent consider themselves ferocious in bed;(1)
- Close to half (45%) stated that their sexual inhibitions have
decreased since they turned 50;(1)
- More than one quarter (27%) stated the quality of their sex life has
improved since they turned 50;(1) and
- Close to half (49%) say that they are satisfied sexually.(1)
>>
"With retirement fast approaching and with sex having fewer taboos than for previous generations, what's not to celebrate about being over 50?" says Dr. David McKenzie, Couples and Sex Therapist in Vancouver. "Reducing stress and having a long-term connection with your partner can greatly contribute towards a more emotionally satisfying relationship as well as a more rewarding sex life."
Spontaneity: Keeping things interesting in the bedroom
Spontaneity is important to the sex life of Canadians 50+, according to almost three quarters of respondents, and over half wish that their sex life was more spontaneous.(1) However, there are concerns as the 50+ think about how sexual difficulties, such as erectile dysfunction (ED), will impact the spontaneity of their sex life as they age. Specifically, one quarter admitted that they or their partner has experienced erectile dysfunction and that it has a negative impact on their sex life.(1) Sexual issues such as experiencing erection difficulties can impact spontaneity in relationships as partners can become frustrated, embarrassed or anxious which, in turn, inhibits the ability for the man to maintain his erection.(2)
"If men and their partners are concerned about achieving and maintaining an erection, they should know that it is a very common medical condition that affects more than a third of Canadian men," says Dr. Gerald Brock, Professor of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Western Ontario. "Furthermore, experiencing difficulty with erections doesn't have to mean the end of spontaneous intimacy, and many treatment options are available that can give couples the freedom they desire and help to ensure an active and healthy sex life as they age, with great success. The really important message, for the literally tens of thousands of Canadian couples affected with sexual dysfunction, is to speak to their healthcare professional for information and understand their treatment options."
The national online survey was conducted by Leger Marketing using Leger Marketing's Web panel between April 14th and April 20th, 2009. It was sponsored by Eli Lilly Canada Inc. The survey interviewed a total of 1,510 respondents who were Canadian adults, 18 years of age and older. Of those 1,510 respondents, 494 were over the age of 50. Using a national random sample of 1,510 respondents from Leger Marketing's Web panel, this method simulates a probability sample that would yield a maximum margin of error of +/-2.5%, 19 times out of 20. The margin of error among the 494 respondents over the age of 50 is +/-4.4%, 19 times out of 20.
About Lilly
Lilly, a leading innovation-driven corporation, is developing a growing portfolio of first-in-class and best-in-class pharmaceutical products by applying the latest research from its own worldwide laboratories and from collaborations with eminent scientific organizations. Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, Lilly provides answers - through medicines and information - for some of the world's most urgent medical needs. Eli Lilly Canada, headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, employs close to 700 people across the country. Additional information about Eli Lilly Canada can be found at www.lilly.ca.
To see original link: http://www.globeinvestor.com/servlet/story/CNW.20090723.C8037/GIStory
Thursday, August 6, 2009
CBC Radio The Current Rebroadcasts Sex and Seniors August 6, 2009
CBC Radio show, The Current, rebroadcasts Sex & Seniors Documentary on August 6, 2009
Sex & Seniors Documentary
Across Canada, seniors are staying healthier and living longer. Add drugs such as Viagra to the mix and it's no surprise that they're more sexually active, too. But that can create problems. HIV infections among seniors are on the rise. The rate of HIV infections among Canadians over fifty has doubled in the past ten years.
The rates of other sexually transmitted diseases are also increasing. And with the number of seniors expected to double over the next 40 years, that's a significant public health challenge ... especially since sex among seniors is still something of a taboo subject.
Susan Bell is a freelance documentary producer based in Montreal. She spent some time with one senior citizen who is on a quest to find a boyfriend. Her documentary is called Faith's Journey and it first aired on The Current in January.
Phizer, the drug company behind Viagra, does not sponsor a safe-sex campaign specifically targeting seniors. But it does fund a group called the Canadian Male Sexual Health Council.
Eli Lily, the makers of Cialis, does not fund an educational campaign targeting seniors. But the company says that anyone who wants to is free to apply for funding through its grants and donations division. And as for Iris ... her HIV test came back negative.
To listen to the full broadcast, click: http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/2009/200908/20090806.html
Sex & Seniors Documentary
Across Canada, seniors are staying healthier and living longer. Add drugs such as Viagra to the mix and it's no surprise that they're more sexually active, too. But that can create problems. HIV infections among seniors are on the rise. The rate of HIV infections among Canadians over fifty has doubled in the past ten years.
The rates of other sexually transmitted diseases are also increasing. And with the number of seniors expected to double over the next 40 years, that's a significant public health challenge ... especially since sex among seniors is still something of a taboo subject.
Susan Bell is a freelance documentary producer based in Montreal. She spent some time with one senior citizen who is on a quest to find a boyfriend. Her documentary is called Faith's Journey and it first aired on The Current in January.
Phizer, the drug company behind Viagra, does not sponsor a safe-sex campaign specifically targeting seniors. But it does fund a group called the Canadian Male Sexual Health Council.
Eli Lily, the makers of Cialis, does not fund an educational campaign targeting seniors. But the company says that anyone who wants to is free to apply for funding through its grants and donations division. And as for Iris ... her HIV test came back negative.
To listen to the full broadcast, click: http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/2009/200908/20090806.html
Friday, July 31, 2009
59 Is the New 30
Not that I usually read the opinion section in the New York Times, but this was brought to my attention today (thank you Eric)and I thought it tied in perfectly to SageHealth Network's mandate of positive aging and healthy aging for older adults and seniors.
Thomas Freidman of the New York Times wrote a wonderful piece on golfer, Tom Watson, who won the British Open at age 59. Friedman's article is more subtle than my usual blog posts on positive aging. Although the piece focuses on Watson's golfing skills and the integrity of the game itself, I do really like the "life affirming" aspect. Watson should indeed be looked upon not only as a great golfer, but an older adult with whom others can identify. He can be seen as an inspiration, a role model---someone who is able to achieve a goal, thus making it possible for his contemporaries to attain the same level of success..... "If he can do it at age 59, then so can I." Definitely a life affirming moment.
MCauch
SageHealth Network
----------------------
July 29, 2009
Op-Ed Columnist
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Last April I took a break to caddy for the former U.S. Open champion Andy North when he teamed up with Tom Watson to defend their title in the two-man Liberty Mutual Legends of Golf tournament in Savannah, Ga. So it was with more than a casual spectator’s interest that I watched in awe on Armed Forces television from Afghanistan as Watson made his amazing run at winning the British Open at age 59. Watson likes to talk about foreign affairs more than golf. So to let him know just how many people wanted him to win, I e-mailed him before the final round: “Even the Taliban are rooting for you.”
Indeed, I have been struck at how many golfers and non-golfers got caught up in Watson’s historic performance — tying for the lead after four rounds at Turnberry, but losing in a playoff to the 36-year-old Stewart Cink. I was not alone in being devastated that Watson was not able to par the last hole and clinch the win. Like millions of others, I shouted at the TV as his ball ran across the 18th green — heading for trouble — “STOP! STOP! STOP!” as if I personally had something at stake. Why was that?
Many reasons. For starters, Watson’s run was freaky unusual — a 59-year-old man who had played his opening two rounds in this tournament with a 16-year-old Italian amateur — was able to best the greatest golfers in the world at least a decade after anyone would have dreamt it possible. Watching this happen actually widened our sense of what any of us is capable of. That is, when Kobe Bryant scores 70 points, we are in awe. When Tiger Woods wins by 15 strokes, we are in awe. But when a man our own age and size whips the world’s best — who are half his age — we identify.
Of course, Watson has unique golfing skills, but if you are a baby boomer you could not help but look at him and say something you would never say about Tiger or Kobe: “He’s my age; he’s my build; he’s my height; and he even had his hip replaced like me. If he can do that, maybe I can do something like that, too.”
Neil Oxman, Watson’s caddy, who is a top Democratic political consultant in his real life, told me: “After Thursday’s round with Tom, when we left the scoring tent I said to him, ‘You know, this is a thing.’ He understood what I meant. On Sunday morning, the two of us were in the corner of the locker room without another human being around, sitting in these two easy chairs facing each other behind a partition. We were chatting about stuff, and I said to him, ‘For a lot of people, what you’re doing is life-affirming.’ I took it from a story about when Betty Comden and Adolph Green — the writers of “Singin’ in the Rain” — showed Leonard Bernstein the famous scene of Gene Kelly. Bernstein said to them, ‘That scene is an affirmation of life.’ What Tom did last week was an affirmation of life.”
Also, as Watson himself appreciates, the way he lost the tournament underscored why golf is the sport most like life. He hit two perfect shots on the 18th hole in the final round, and the second one bounced just a little too hard and ran through the green, leaving him a difficult chip back, which he was unable to get up and down. Had his ball stopped a foot shorter, he would have had an easy two-putt and a win.
That’s the point. Baseball, basketball and football are played on flat surfaces designed to give true bounces. Golf is played on an uneven terrain designed to surprise. Good and bad bounces are built into the essence of the game. And the reason golf is so much like life is that the game — like life — is all about how you react to those good and bad bounces. Do you blame your caddy? Do you cheat? Do you throw your clubs? Or do you accept it all with dignity and grace and move on, as Watson always has. Hence the saying: Play one round of golf with someone and you will learn everything you need to know about his character.
Golf is all about individual character. The ball is fixed. No one throws it to you. You initiate the swing, and you alone have to live with the results. There are no teammates to blame or commiserate with. Also, pro golfers, unlike baseball, football or basketball players, have no fixed salaries. They eat what they kill. If they score well, they make money. If they don’t, they don’t make money. I wonder what the average N.B.A. player’s free-throw shooting percentage would be if he had to make free throws to get paid the way golfers have to make three-foot putts?
This wonderful but cruel game never stops testing or teaching you. “The only comment I can make,” Watson told me after, “is one that the immortal Bobby Jones related: ‘One learns from defeat, not from victory.’ I may never have the chance again to beat the kids, but I took one thing from the last hole: hitting both the tee shot and the approach shots exactly the way I meant to wasn’t good enough. ... I had to finish.”
So Tom Watson got a brutal lesson in golf that he’ll never forget, but he gave us all an incredible lesson in possibilities — one we’ll never forget.
Original link: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/29/opinion/29friedman.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print
Thomas Freidman of the New York Times wrote a wonderful piece on golfer, Tom Watson, who won the British Open at age 59. Friedman's article is more subtle than my usual blog posts on positive aging. Although the piece focuses on Watson's golfing skills and the integrity of the game itself, I do really like the "life affirming" aspect. Watson should indeed be looked upon not only as a great golfer, but an older adult with whom others can identify. He can be seen as an inspiration, a role model---someone who is able to achieve a goal, thus making it possible for his contemporaries to attain the same level of success..... "If he can do it at age 59, then so can I." Definitely a life affirming moment.
MCauch
SageHealth Network
----------------------
July 29, 2009
Op-Ed Columnist
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Last April I took a break to caddy for the former U.S. Open champion Andy North when he teamed up with Tom Watson to defend their title in the two-man Liberty Mutual Legends of Golf tournament in Savannah, Ga. So it was with more than a casual spectator’s interest that I watched in awe on Armed Forces television from Afghanistan as Watson made his amazing run at winning the British Open at age 59. Watson likes to talk about foreign affairs more than golf. So to let him know just how many people wanted him to win, I e-mailed him before the final round: “Even the Taliban are rooting for you.”
Indeed, I have been struck at how many golfers and non-golfers got caught up in Watson’s historic performance — tying for the lead after four rounds at Turnberry, but losing in a playoff to the 36-year-old Stewart Cink. I was not alone in being devastated that Watson was not able to par the last hole and clinch the win. Like millions of others, I shouted at the TV as his ball ran across the 18th green — heading for trouble — “STOP! STOP! STOP!” as if I personally had something at stake. Why was that?
Many reasons. For starters, Watson’s run was freaky unusual — a 59-year-old man who had played his opening two rounds in this tournament with a 16-year-old Italian amateur — was able to best the greatest golfers in the world at least a decade after anyone would have dreamt it possible. Watching this happen actually widened our sense of what any of us is capable of. That is, when Kobe Bryant scores 70 points, we are in awe. When Tiger Woods wins by 15 strokes, we are in awe. But when a man our own age and size whips the world’s best — who are half his age — we identify.
Of course, Watson has unique golfing skills, but if you are a baby boomer you could not help but look at him and say something you would never say about Tiger or Kobe: “He’s my age; he’s my build; he’s my height; and he even had his hip replaced like me. If he can do that, maybe I can do something like that, too.”
Neil Oxman, Watson’s caddy, who is a top Democratic political consultant in his real life, told me: “After Thursday’s round with Tom, when we left the scoring tent I said to him, ‘You know, this is a thing.’ He understood what I meant. On Sunday morning, the two of us were in the corner of the locker room without another human being around, sitting in these two easy chairs facing each other behind a partition. We were chatting about stuff, and I said to him, ‘For a lot of people, what you’re doing is life-affirming.’ I took it from a story about when Betty Comden and Adolph Green — the writers of “Singin’ in the Rain” — showed Leonard Bernstein the famous scene of Gene Kelly. Bernstein said to them, ‘That scene is an affirmation of life.’ What Tom did last week was an affirmation of life.”
Also, as Watson himself appreciates, the way he lost the tournament underscored why golf is the sport most like life. He hit two perfect shots on the 18th hole in the final round, and the second one bounced just a little too hard and ran through the green, leaving him a difficult chip back, which he was unable to get up and down. Had his ball stopped a foot shorter, he would have had an easy two-putt and a win.
That’s the point. Baseball, basketball and football are played on flat surfaces designed to give true bounces. Golf is played on an uneven terrain designed to surprise. Good and bad bounces are built into the essence of the game. And the reason golf is so much like life is that the game — like life — is all about how you react to those good and bad bounces. Do you blame your caddy? Do you cheat? Do you throw your clubs? Or do you accept it all with dignity and grace and move on, as Watson always has. Hence the saying: Play one round of golf with someone and you will learn everything you need to know about his character.
Golf is all about individual character. The ball is fixed. No one throws it to you. You initiate the swing, and you alone have to live with the results. There are no teammates to blame or commiserate with. Also, pro golfers, unlike baseball, football or basketball players, have no fixed salaries. They eat what they kill. If they score well, they make money. If they don’t, they don’t make money. I wonder what the average N.B.A. player’s free-throw shooting percentage would be if he had to make free throws to get paid the way golfers have to make three-foot putts?
This wonderful but cruel game never stops testing or teaching you. “The only comment I can make,” Watson told me after, “is one that the immortal Bobby Jones related: ‘One learns from defeat, not from victory.’ I may never have the chance again to beat the kids, but I took one thing from the last hole: hitting both the tee shot and the approach shots exactly the way I meant to wasn’t good enough. ... I had to finish.”
So Tom Watson got a brutal lesson in golf that he’ll never forget, but he gave us all an incredible lesson in possibilities — one we’ll never forget.
Original link: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/29/opinion/29friedman.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print
Saturday, July 18, 2009
What's so bad about aging?
by Elizabeth Rogers, 50Plus.com
Remember when you were a kid and people over the age of 20 seemed grown-up -- and over 30 was practically ancient ?
It's not surprising that our idea of "old" changes as we age, but new research shows that our attitudes about aging itself are changing too. A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center's Social & Demographic Trends project in February and March 2009 revealed some interesting trends -- as well as misperceptions -- about "growing old."
The Growing Old in America: Expectations vs. Reality study polled nearly 3000 adults of all ages and asked about topics such as negative benchmarks of aging (like memory loss and failing health), what benefits are typically enjoyed by older adults and when old age actually starts. Here are some of the key findings:
Young(er) at heart
Here's further proof that age is "all in your head": The results show that as people get older, there's a widening gap between how old they feel versus how old they actually are . Not surprisingly, people in their twenties report feeling like they are in their twenties. However, that "twenty-something" feeling follows people into their thirties, and after that people continue to fall even further behind. For example, many forty year olds still feel like they're in their mid-thirties, and people in their fifties feel like they're in their forties.
Naturally, the gap gets even wider as age increases. According to the survey, only one third of people over 65 report that they feel exactly their age versus the 60 per cent who say they feel younger.
Just how much younger? Nearly half of people over the age of 50 feel ten years younger. Respondents in the 65 - 74 age group report feeling even younger than that -- with one in three people saying they felt 10 - 19 years younger, and one in six feeling 20 years younger than their actual age.
"Old age" -- when does it start?
If people are feeling younger than ever before, at what age does "being old" actually start? Survey respondents had an opinion on that subject too, and the results point to yet another sliding scale. The average reply -- age 68 -- only tells part of the story. When asked at what age the average person becomes old, respondents in the 18 - 29 age group say age 60. However, 30 - 49 year olds push that age back to 69, and people 65+ say "old age" doesn't start until 74.
How do people 75 and over feel about that? Only 35 per cent of them say they feel old. "Old age" is something that happens at a later time, and the majority of respondents don't consider themselves to have reached it yet.
The numbers aren't shocking -- after all, our perception of "old" changes as we accumulate candles on our birthday cakes. However, what's interesting to note is the gender gap. According to the Pew Research Center, men on average say that "old' begins at an earlier age than women do. Across all age groups, women say old age starts at 70 while men place the threshold at 66. (Perhaps they can be forgiven -- after all, a man's life expectancy is still about five years less than a woman's).
You know you're getting old when...
Numbers weren't the only thing the Pew Research Center asked about. Other markers such as failing health, forgetting names and retirement were considered too.
What makes a person old? Grey hair and grandchildren barely make the list with only 13 and 15 per cent of respondents saying they're a marker of old age. Only one in five people link retirement to being old. And not being sexually active? Only one third think that makes people old.
However, when it comes to failing health and forgetting familiar names, respondents were split with answers at 47 per cent and 51 per cent respectively.
On the flip side, nearly two thirds of people believe a person is old when they turn 75, and almost 80 per cent think turning 85 was an indicator. Being unable to drive or unable to live independently were major factors too, with results showing up at 66 per cent and 76 per cent respectively.
In other words, numbers aren't the only way to define age -- quality of life and independence must be considered too.
Aging: not as bad as we think...?
So what are we afraid of anyway? The study shows that the expectations of younger people don't match what older age groups actually experience when it comes to the negative aspects of aging. Considering the following:
- More than half of people under 65 expect memory loss as they age -- but only one quarter of people over 65 report experiencing it (that's a gap of 32 per cent).
- When it comes to driving, there's a similar disparity: only 14 per cent of respondents over 65 say they are no longer able to drive, but 45 per cent of people under 65 anticipate the issue.
- Health issues may not be as bad either: 42 per cent expect a serious illness but only half that number of people over 65 report experiencing one.
- What about feeling lonely, being a burden to others and not feeling needed? Again, there's a significant difference between what younger respondents predict and what older respondents actually experience.
- And there's good news when it comes to sex -- while one third of younger respondents predict they won't be sexually active, nearly 80 per cent of people over 65 report that they still are. (In fact, age may even be an advantage in the bedroom -- see The Zoomer Report for details).
...Or not as good as we anticipate?
Are these really the "golden years?" People over 65 report experiencing the many benefits that come with age. Sixty per cent of people over 65 say they're feeling less stress than when they were younger, and they're getting more respect. Two thirds are enjoying more time with friends and family and spending more time on their interests and hobbies. Despite economic woes, the majority say they're feeling more financially secure than when they were younger.
But if you're under 65, don't set your sights too high just yet... The survey also shows that the reality may not measure up to the expectations of Baby Boomers and Generation X:
- Even though people are enjoying more time with their loved ones and doing the things they love, there's a gap between expectations and reality of 12 and 16 per cent respectively. In short, older people don't have as much time as younger people think.
- What about travelling and volunteering? Around 80 per cent of younger people expect to spend more on these activities when they're older, yet just over half of older respondents actually do.
- When it comes to careers, nearly 40 per cent in the under 65 cohort anticipate the opportunity for a second career, but only 14 per cent of people 65+ report having one.
- And what about lower stress levels and more financial security? The proportions don't quite match up there either. While the gap isn't big, the numbers suggest that some people may be disappointed in the future.
To keep things in perspective, more than half of adults over 65 reported that the thing they value most about being older is spending more time with family -- particularly the grandchildren.
Overall, life is good
When you put the challenges and benefits together, what do you get? Researchers found that older adults are about as happy as everyone else. One question even tackled the issue directly: respondents were asked if they were "very happy", "pretty happy" or "not too happy". The per centages did vary among the age groups, but not by wide margins. For instance, about 20 per cent of people in the 50-64, 65-74 and over 75 age groups report feeling "not too happy" compared to 14 per cent of 30-49 year olds or 9 per cent of adults between 18 and 29.
Like the younger cohorts, the majority of people over 50 report being "very happy" or "pretty happy".
How can that be? Researchers note that many of the indicators of happiness earlier in life -- like good health, financial security, and friends -- are still present later in life. Part of the difference could be because of marriage, which is an indicator of happiness earlier in life but not necessarily later on. (That's not to say that "old married couples" are less happy on the whole -- it could be that many respondents are widows or widowers).
Overall, older people are pleased about how their lives have shaped up so far -- 45 per cent of adults over 75 even report that their life has turned out better than anticipated, while only 5 per cent say it turned out worse. (The other 50 per cent either report that life turned out the way they expected or didn't answer).
So what's the bottom line? The results suggest that "aging well" isn't an abstract idea -- it's becoming a reality. Our ideas about aging are still evolving, but they're headed in the right direction.
ON THE WEB
Read the survey results and download the full report from the Pew Research Center.
(Note: Researchers acknowledge that some older respondents couldn't be reached for the study due to factors like ill health or living in a nursing home. To help offset this bias, they contacted a sample of 200 adults caregivers and included those responses in their consideration.)
Do these results match your own experience? Tell us in the comments.
Original source: http://lifestyle.sympatico.msn.ca/Home/ContentPosting_50Plus?newsitemid=c9583477-57a0-4816-b2d9-2963c6e3e8ac&feedname=50_PLUS&show=False&number=5&showbyline=True&subtitle=&detect=&abc=abc&date=False
Remember when you were a kid and people over the age of 20 seemed grown-up -- and over 30 was practically ancient ?
It's not surprising that our idea of "old" changes as we age, but new research shows that our attitudes about aging itself are changing too. A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center's Social & Demographic Trends project in February and March 2009 revealed some interesting trends -- as well as misperceptions -- about "growing old."
The Growing Old in America: Expectations vs. Reality study polled nearly 3000 adults of all ages and asked about topics such as negative benchmarks of aging (like memory loss and failing health), what benefits are typically enjoyed by older adults and when old age actually starts. Here are some of the key findings:
Young(er) at heart
Here's further proof that age is "all in your head": The results show that as people get older, there's a widening gap between how old they feel versus how old they actually are . Not surprisingly, people in their twenties report feeling like they are in their twenties. However, that "twenty-something" feeling follows people into their thirties, and after that people continue to fall even further behind. For example, many forty year olds still feel like they're in their mid-thirties, and people in their fifties feel like they're in their forties.
Naturally, the gap gets even wider as age increases. According to the survey, only one third of people over 65 report that they feel exactly their age versus the 60 per cent who say they feel younger.
Just how much younger? Nearly half of people over the age of 50 feel ten years younger. Respondents in the 65 - 74 age group report feeling even younger than that -- with one in three people saying they felt 10 - 19 years younger, and one in six feeling 20 years younger than their actual age.
"Old age" -- when does it start?
If people are feeling younger than ever before, at what age does "being old" actually start? Survey respondents had an opinion on that subject too, and the results point to yet another sliding scale. The average reply -- age 68 -- only tells part of the story. When asked at what age the average person becomes old, respondents in the 18 - 29 age group say age 60. However, 30 - 49 year olds push that age back to 69, and people 65+ say "old age" doesn't start until 74.
How do people 75 and over feel about that? Only 35 per cent of them say they feel old. "Old age" is something that happens at a later time, and the majority of respondents don't consider themselves to have reached it yet.
The numbers aren't shocking -- after all, our perception of "old" changes as we accumulate candles on our birthday cakes. However, what's interesting to note is the gender gap. According to the Pew Research Center, men on average say that "old' begins at an earlier age than women do. Across all age groups, women say old age starts at 70 while men place the threshold at 66. (Perhaps they can be forgiven -- after all, a man's life expectancy is still about five years less than a woman's).
You know you're getting old when...
Numbers weren't the only thing the Pew Research Center asked about. Other markers such as failing health, forgetting names and retirement were considered too.
What makes a person old? Grey hair and grandchildren barely make the list with only 13 and 15 per cent of respondents saying they're a marker of old age. Only one in five people link retirement to being old. And not being sexually active? Only one third think that makes people old.
However, when it comes to failing health and forgetting familiar names, respondents were split with answers at 47 per cent and 51 per cent respectively.
On the flip side, nearly two thirds of people believe a person is old when they turn 75, and almost 80 per cent think turning 85 was an indicator. Being unable to drive or unable to live independently were major factors too, with results showing up at 66 per cent and 76 per cent respectively.
In other words, numbers aren't the only way to define age -- quality of life and independence must be considered too.
Aging: not as bad as we think...?
So what are we afraid of anyway? The study shows that the expectations of younger people don't match what older age groups actually experience when it comes to the negative aspects of aging. Considering the following:
- More than half of people under 65 expect memory loss as they age -- but only one quarter of people over 65 report experiencing it (that's a gap of 32 per cent).
- When it comes to driving, there's a similar disparity: only 14 per cent of respondents over 65 say they are no longer able to drive, but 45 per cent of people under 65 anticipate the issue.
- Health issues may not be as bad either: 42 per cent expect a serious illness but only half that number of people over 65 report experiencing one.
- What about feeling lonely, being a burden to others and not feeling needed? Again, there's a significant difference between what younger respondents predict and what older respondents actually experience.
- And there's good news when it comes to sex -- while one third of younger respondents predict they won't be sexually active, nearly 80 per cent of people over 65 report that they still are. (In fact, age may even be an advantage in the bedroom -- see The Zoomer Report for details).
...Or not as good as we anticipate?
Are these really the "golden years?" People over 65 report experiencing the many benefits that come with age. Sixty per cent of people over 65 say they're feeling less stress than when they were younger, and they're getting more respect. Two thirds are enjoying more time with friends and family and spending more time on their interests and hobbies. Despite economic woes, the majority say they're feeling more financially secure than when they were younger.
But if you're under 65, don't set your sights too high just yet... The survey also shows that the reality may not measure up to the expectations of Baby Boomers and Generation X:
- Even though people are enjoying more time with their loved ones and doing the things they love, there's a gap between expectations and reality of 12 and 16 per cent respectively. In short, older people don't have as much time as younger people think.
- What about travelling and volunteering? Around 80 per cent of younger people expect to spend more on these activities when they're older, yet just over half of older respondents actually do.
- When it comes to careers, nearly 40 per cent in the under 65 cohort anticipate the opportunity for a second career, but only 14 per cent of people 65+ report having one.
- And what about lower stress levels and more financial security? The proportions don't quite match up there either. While the gap isn't big, the numbers suggest that some people may be disappointed in the future.
To keep things in perspective, more than half of adults over 65 reported that the thing they value most about being older is spending more time with family -- particularly the grandchildren.
Overall, life is good
When you put the challenges and benefits together, what do you get? Researchers found that older adults are about as happy as everyone else. One question even tackled the issue directly: respondents were asked if they were "very happy", "pretty happy" or "not too happy". The per centages did vary among the age groups, but not by wide margins. For instance, about 20 per cent of people in the 50-64, 65-74 and over 75 age groups report feeling "not too happy" compared to 14 per cent of 30-49 year olds or 9 per cent of adults between 18 and 29.
Like the younger cohorts, the majority of people over 50 report being "very happy" or "pretty happy".
How can that be? Researchers note that many of the indicators of happiness earlier in life -- like good health, financial security, and friends -- are still present later in life. Part of the difference could be because of marriage, which is an indicator of happiness earlier in life but not necessarily later on. (That's not to say that "old married couples" are less happy on the whole -- it could be that many respondents are widows or widowers).
Overall, older people are pleased about how their lives have shaped up so far -- 45 per cent of adults over 75 even report that their life has turned out better than anticipated, while only 5 per cent say it turned out worse. (The other 50 per cent either report that life turned out the way they expected or didn't answer).
So what's the bottom line? The results suggest that "aging well" isn't an abstract idea -- it's becoming a reality. Our ideas about aging are still evolving, but they're headed in the right direction.
ON THE WEB
Read the survey results and download the full report from the Pew Research Center.
(Note: Researchers acknowledge that some older respondents couldn't be reached for the study due to factors like ill health or living in a nursing home. To help offset this bias, they contacted a sample of 200 adults caregivers and included those responses in their consideration.)
Do these results match your own experience? Tell us in the comments.
Original source: http://lifestyle.sympatico.msn.ca/Home/ContentPosting_50Plus?newsitemid=c9583477-57a0-4816-b2d9-2963c6e3e8ac&feedname=50_PLUS&show=False&number=5&showbyline=True&subtitle=&detect=&abc=abc&date=False
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)